This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our PRIVACY POLICY for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
  • HONG KONG

    Hong Kong introduces unified fund exemption regime

HONG KONG - Hong Kong introduces unified fund exemption regime

May 2019

A unified profits tax exemption for all privately-offered funds became operative on 1 April 2019, under new provisions in the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO) as amended by the Inland Revenue (Profits Tax Exemption For Funds) (Amendment) Ordinance 2019, gazetted on 20 February 2019.

This article highlights the salient features of the new unified fund exemption (UFE). Certain aspects of the new regime are complicated. The Inland Revenue Department (IRD) will issue a departmental practice note to explain its interpretation and assessing practices in this connection.

References to sections and schedules refer to sections and schedules of the IRO, unless otherwise stated.

Key conditions of the UFE

Regardless of its tax residence, a fund is exempt from profits tax in respect of its assessable profits if the following conditions are met throughout a year of assessment:

  1. It meets the definition of a fund for the purpose of the tax exemption;
  2. The assessable profits are earned from qualifying transactions (and incidental transactions subject to a 5% threshold); and
  3. The qualifying transactions are carried out in Hong Kong by or through, or arranged in Hong Kong by a specified person; or alternatively the fund is a qualified investment fund.

The meaning given to a fund for the purpose of the tax exemption is similar to that of a collective investment scheme under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). One key feature is that the participating persons do not have day-to-day control over the management of the property being pooled and managed under the fund. Certain arrangements are specifically excluded, such as group captive funds, employee funds and business undertakings for general commercial or industrial purposes.

Qualifying transactions refer to transactions in assets of a class specified in Schedule 16C:

  1. Securities
  2. Shares in private companies (with exceptions)
  3. Futures contracts
  4. Foreign exchange contracts
  5. Deposits other than those made by way of a money-lending business
  6. Deposits made with a bank*
  7. Certificates of deposit*
  8. Exchange-traded commodities
  9. Foreign currencies
  10. OTC derivatives*
  11. An investee company’s shares co-invested by a partner fund and the Innovation and Technology Venture Fund (ITVF) Corporation under the ITVF Scheme

The meaning of incidental transactions is similar to that under the existing offshore fund exemption (OFE), and a similar 5% safe harbour threshold applies.

A specified person is a corporation licensed or authorised financial institution registered under Part V of the SFO to carry on a business in any regulated activity.

A qualified investment fund has a similar meaning as a qualifying fund under the OFE regime, ie a fund after final closing having at least five investors (as defined in the IRO) with capital commitments made by investors exceeding 90% of the aggregated capital commitments, and the originator together with its associates receiving no more than 30% of the fund’s net proceeds.

What has been changed from the OFE

The definition of a fund is wide enough to cover Hong Kong incorporated or non-Hong Kong incorporated corporations or partnerships. A fund may be centrally managed and controlled in Hong Kong or outside Hong Kong.

There is no “tainting”, so an eligible fund could still benefit from profits tax exemption on its qualifying transactions even if it carries out other transactions. Those other transactions (if not incidental transactions and/or over the 5% threshold) would be subject to tax separately.

Investment into Hong Kong private companies and businesses is permitted provided the private company passes the following tests:

  • Hong Kong immovable property test: the private company does not hold directly or indirectly more than 10% of its assets in immovable property (other than infrastructure) in Hong Kong; and
  • Holding period test: the investment in the private company has been held by the fund for at least two years; or
  • Short-term asset test: if the holding period test is not satisfied:
  1. The fund does not have a controlling stake in the private company; or
  2. Where the fund has a controlling stake in the private company, the private company does not hold more than 50% of the value of its assets in short-term assets (as defined in the IRO).

An open-ended fund company (OFC) will now come under the new UFE and the previous stringent OFC exemption conditions such as the “non-closely held” requirement and deemed taxation of carried interest are now removed.

What stays the same as the OFE

Profits tax exemption is offered to a special purpose entity (SPE) owned by a tax-exempt fund. It remains a limiting factor that the activity of the SPE has to be limited to holding and administering investee private companies; further, the tax exemption for an SPE is narrower than the fund, ie an SPE is only exempt from profits tax in respect of assessable profits from transactions in specified securities (as defined in the IRO) in investee private companies, or interposed SPE.

The new UFE regime also includes anti-avoidance provisions to deem certain Hong Kong residents taxable in respect of their proportionate share of the assessable profits of a tax-exempt fund and SPE irrespective of whether the residents have received or will receive any distributions from the fund.

The OFE regime remains relevant

The existing OFE regime will run in parallel with the new UFE regime on and after 1 April 2019 to offer profits tax exemption to a non-resident person which falls short of a fund for the purposes of the UFE, provided the non-resident person satisfies the exemption conditions under the OFE. The conditions and extent of tax exemption under the OFE remain unaffected by the introduction of the UFE regime.

BDO comment

The introduction of the UFE is a long-awaited positive step finally taken to further promote Hong Kong as an asset management centre. We look forward to the IRD’s practice note which should clarify its interpretation and practical administrative issues.

Some of the areas that appear to be unresolved under the UFE include:

  • Hong Kong stamp duty on transfer of shares in a corporate fund that takes the form of a Hong Kong incorporated company, including an OFC.
  • Whether receipt of dividends from a Hong Kong corporate fund is specifically tax-exempt under Section 26(a) in the absence of any overriding provision such as OFC-specific Section 20AJ(2) which is now repealed.
  • Whether listed securities held by an SPE of a tax-exempt fund could benefit from profits tax exemption as if the listed securities were held directly by the fund.

The definition of investee private companies appears to be narrow as it is currently written because it precludes investees in other corporate forms, such as trusts, partnerships or other non-common law forms.

It is disappointing that the IRD still takes the view that “transaction” refers only to the buying and selling of securities and not to the holding of securities to generate income. As a result of this interpretation, interest from debt securities can only be income from incident transactions and subject to the 5% threshold. That means credit funds still cannot benefit from Hong Kong’s fund exemption regimes.

It is also important to keep in mind that a fund centrally managed and controlled in Hong Kong may be viewed as carrying on a business in Hong Kong although it is specifically exempted from the payment of profits tax under the UFE regime. In that case, the fund may need to be registered under the Business Registration Ordinance, with tax filing obligations from a compliance perspective. In comparison, a Singapore resident fund under the Onshore Fund Exemption Scheme (Section 13R of the Singapore Income Tax Act) is required to file annual tax returns.

If the onshore fund takes the form of an OFC, there would be regulatory compliance obligations with the Securities and Futures Commission, in addition to tax and corporate compliance.

The UFE may lead to opportunities for asset management groups to simplify and streamline their operating protocol. For instance, funds with offshore management may consider “on-shoring” in Hong Kong, particularly in view of the recent introduction of substance requirements in offshore tax jurisdictions, eg the Cayman Islands. 

Please contact the BDO tax team to discuss how we may assist you in revisiting existing structures and/or launching new funds.

Agnes Cheung
[email protected]

* As defined in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the SFO